#1 Neuroscientist: How To Manifest Love & Abundance in Your Life!

Can grief become a compass rather than a coffin?

What if loss could be reframed as a porous border between two ways of knowing — the rational and the felt? I left this conversation feeling both unsettled and quietly hopeful. Dr. Tara Swart, a neuroscientist who has spent her life mapping the brain, describes a personal reckoning that pushed her to test ideas she once taught from the podium.

When science meets longing

Her story begins not with data but with an ache. After losing her husband, she resisted the easy comfort of busyness and instead chose to go “to the bottom of the hole” — to sit with the pain until it loosened its grip. The striking thing: she didn’t abandon scientific rigor. She folded curiosity into grief, treating signs and synchronicities as signals worth investigating. That marriage of skepticism and wonder gives the narrative a rare credibility.

Signs as a method, not superstition

There’s a structural approach here, not wild faith. Dr. Swart suggests choosing a meaningful symbol, anchoring it in a memory, and setting simple parameters — three sightings by a certain time, for example. The anecdote about infinity symbols appearing during her courtship then reappearing after loss reads like a pattern recognition experiment where the sample size includes daily life. When she tells the story of a friend who matched with someone named after her late husband on a dating app, she does so with both delight and the guarded verification of a scientist.

The body as a vault of memory

What really grabbed me was the reframing of intuition as embodied knowledge. Forget the tired myth of a single sixth sense: Dr. Swart walks us into a broader map of human perception, arguing we have many channels of input. Trauma, she explains, gets lodged in muscles, fascia, even vascular tone — not just in the hippocampus. That makes somatic practices less woo and more practical. Dance, chanting, drumming and humming become tools to unlock buried information and to recalibrate how the body signals danger or possibility.

Practical rituals that feel human

Her guidance is both gentle and operative. Short breathwork and a listening meditation teach the nervous system to notice stillness amid noise. There’s also value in playful experiments — ask for a button to appear or a feather to show up — and then check if the universe meets you halfway. She frames these experiments with parameters so they function like small, emotionally resonant tests of attention and expectation.

Ancestors, art, and adaptive brains

Swart’s curiosity wanders through anthropology: ancient peoples danced, painted and made ornaments long before modern medicine, suggesting creativity has survival value. She connects that to neuroplasticity: emotional intensity plus repetition rewires circuits. That’s why communal experiences — a weekend retreat or a charged conversation — can leave “brains like soft clay.” It’s a reminder that change doesn’t always require months of willpower; sometimes it needs potency and repetition.

When intuition argues with the checklist

Practical dilemmas come up: why do people ignore gut feelings and signposts? Her answer is straightforward. Society privileges logic, and our inner signals grow quiet without practice. Journaling, small risk-taking and honest post-mortems of past mistakes are the scaffolding that teaches you to trust embodied sense-making. She also advocates triangulating: ask a handful of trusted friends if you’re unsure. If one person objects, listen; if a chorus objects, pay attention.

How to begin — a short protocol

• Pick a symbol tied to a private memory.
• Set a clear, time-bound request for sightings.
• Use short somatic practices daily — breathwork or movement.
• Track experiences in a journal to build pattern awareness.

Those steps feel small, almost ridiculous, until they aren’t. The method turns a longing for connection into a repeatable practice. It transforms waiting into active noticing.

What I found surprising

Honestly, I didn't expect a hard-science framing for things usually dismissed as “woo.” The claim that the immune system can be considered a physiological sense, or that intuition lives in fascial tissue rather than abstract mystery, pushed me to re-evaluate assumptions. Even her meditation — simple listening and locating the quietest sound — works as a tiny recalibration you can do anywhere.

Final reflection

The most affecting takeaway was not proof of the afterlife, but a model for grieving that privileges attention over avoidance. If we accept that feeling is data — and that the body archives wisdom — then grief, ritual and curiosity become tools for reconnection. Maybe the bigger question is not whether signs are “real,” but what we become when we start looking for them with structure, tenderness and scientific curiosity.

—